Nibiru, Anunnaki in Planet X

Nibiru je ime nebesnega telesa po babilonskih zapisih na tablicah. Po njihovem vedenju je bil Nibiru mogočni nebesni predmet, povezan z bogom Mardukom. Nibiru pomeni "kraj, ki prečka" ali "kraj tranzicije".

V mnogih babilonskih besedilih se primerja z planetom Jupiter, čeprav je na tablici 5 v Enûma Elish povezana s polarno zvezdo.

Ali so antični Anunnakiji  manjkajoča povezava v naši zgodovini?

V zadnjih nekaj desetletjih je bilo izdanih veliko novih teorij, da je Nibiru planet, ki kroži okoli našega sonca daleč za krožnico Neptuna in prečka orbite drugih planetov. Kljub tem trditvam znanstvena skupnost kategorično zavrača obstoj takšnega planeta in v zvezi s tem je dala več izjav..

V članku, napisan v Skeptical Inquirer, je Morrison zapisal, da so za astronome "vztrajne izjave o bližnjem, vendar nevidnem planetu preprosto absurdne."

Ta sovraštvo do "Nibira" verjetno izvira iz dejstva, da so bile v številnih primerih podane trditve, da bo "lopovski planet" na svoji 3.600 letni orbiti vstopil v notranji del sončnega sistema in ob tem obisku povzročil katastrofo na Zemlji.

Osem let kasneje so se vodilni astronomi navdušili nad planetom, ki ga ne vidijo. Se spomniš vroče razprave o "Devetem planetu"?

Caltechova astronoma Mike Brown in Konstantin Batygin sta leta 2016 postavila eksplozivno trditev: na podlagi orbitalnega gibanja predmetov (asteroidov, kometov in planetoidov) v Kuiperjevem pasu - regiji, ki je za Neptunom in je dom Plutona in drugih nebessnih teles (Sedna, Makemake, Haumea, Erida, Cerera in še kakšnih 400 podobne velikosti) - mora biti zelo velik, zelo daleč, skrit, razen za svojo subtilno gravitacijsko privlačnost na preostalem sončnem sistemu: za naše oči neviden planet.

Po opravljenih raziskavah je "uradna" znanstvena skupnost ohranila svojo hladno držo in obravnava raziskave Mickael Browna in Konstantina Batygina bolj kot ne neverjetne.

Kot je pojasnjeno v Scientific American, je model Brown in Batygin najboljša možnost in so predstavili ta skrivnostni predmet z približno desetkrat večjo maso od Zemljine ter da je 20-krat bolj oddaljen od sonca kot Neptun. In da trenutno prehaja skozi tisto, kar bi lahko bila 20-letna orbita na nebu vidna blizu konstelacije Orion. Brown in Batygin sta jo imenovala Planet Nine. Ne pozabimo pa, kako so odkrili nekatere najpomembnejše planete v našem sončnem sistemu: vse je začelo kot ideja.

In zanimivo je, da zamisel, da neznani planeti obstajajo daleč od sonca, ni nekaj novega. Pravzaprav je takšne trditve mogoče izslediti že v prvih letih 18. stoletja, ki so spodbudili odkritje Plutona in Neptuna v sredini 20. stoletja.

Ko je govoril o nevidnem planetu, je Batygin dejal:

"Trudim se, da ne bi verjel v svoje rezultate. Pomembno je, da obdržimo skeptično oko. "

"Ampak, počutim se bolj udobno, kot pred dvema letoma, ker teorija še vedno lepo drži. Bolj ko gledamo, bolj vidimo sončni sistem, da brez Planeta 9 nima smisla. "

Znanstveni forumi opozarjajo na skupno strategijo, ki bi lahko zamenjala in hranila mit o obstoju tega planeta, ki se nanaša na povezavo planeta Nibiru z vsemi komentarji o Planetu X, Planetu 9 ali temnemu planetu (dwarf planet) Eris.

Mnogi avtorji, ki so prepričani, da je mitološki planet starodavnih Sumerov, da je Nibiru že viden in / ali da NASA skriva informacije, ter za dokaz objavljajo fotografije z optičnim učinkom, ki se pojavlja pri slabo kakovostnih fotoaparatih pri fotografiranju Sonca (svetlobni odboj – lens flear, ki nikoli ni viden s prostim očesom).

V Googlu, na YouTubu in drugih družabnih omrežjih najdemo zakladnico informacij o Planetu X, aka Nibiru, čeprav brez znanstvenih referenc. A ne pozabimo, da se nekega dne čisti mit za astronomijo, leta kasneje spremeni v resničnost, to pa dokazujeta Brown in Batygin z Planetom 9.

Vrnimo se k Nibiru…

Eden od tipičnih argumentov, ki pojasnjujejo pomanjkanje vidnosti mitološkega planeta, je ta, da: "Človeško oko lahko vidi samo barve, ki so znotraj spektra vidne svetlobe, to je, kadar ima emisija svetlobe valovno dolžino 400-700 nm. Po drugi strani pa ima infrardeča svetloba daljšo valovno dolžino, zato potrebujemo fotoaparat, ki lahko zazna infrardečo svetlobo, bolj verjetno tisti, ki ga oddaja Nibiru.”

Vendar pa hkrati navaja, da je Nibiru planet (zato mora odražati vidno svetlobo Sonca) in ne zvezda, ki oddaja svetlobo.

Ali to pomeni, da čeprav ga nismo opazili, ni tam? No, ne, res mislim, poglej nazaj na planet 9 in za njim. Ne moremo ga opaziti, vendar obstajajo dokazi, da obstaja.

Vendar so dokazi, da je Nibiru resničen, redki in večinoma temeljijo na starodavnih mitoloških besedilih in prevodu sumerskih, mezopotamskih in egipčanskih besedil.

Kataklizma Nibira je domnevno katastrofalen trk med Zemljo in masivnim planetom, ki naj bi bil dom starodavnih Anunnakijev.

Sporna teorija se prvič pojavi, ko je dr. Robert Harrington, uradni astronom ameriške mornarice, objavil odkritje Nibira (in potem iznenada umre).

Domnevna orbita Nibira.

Vendar pa je avtor, ki je v sodobni kulturi populariziral Nibiru, pisatelj in prevajalec babilonščine, mezopotanščine in sumerščine, arheolog Zecharia Sitchin je svoje interpretacije babilonske in sumerske mitologije, zanikal kakršnokoli povezavo med svojim delom in različnimi trditvami o prihajajočem apokalipsi.

Avtor v svoji knjigi 12th Planet preiskuje svojo interpretacijo starodavnih mezopotamskih verskih besedil, kako velikanski planet (imenovano Nibiru ali Marduk) vsakih 3600 let pride v bližino Zemlje, kar omogoča, da njegovi čustveni prebivalci komunicirajo s človeštvom.

Sitchin je ta bitja identificiral kot Anunnakije v sumerski mitologiji in na osnovi teh prevodov trdi, da so bili to prvi bogovi človeštva, tuja bitja, ki so nas ustvarila.

Kot pojasnjujejo Sitchin in ostali prevajalci starodavnih glinenih tablic, je Nibiru (ki se imenuje "dvanajsti planet"). Interpretacija sončnega sistema Sumerov, je naštela vseh osem planetov, plus Pluton, Sonce in Luno). Tehnološko napredna nezemeljska rasa, imenovana Anunnaki v sumerskem mitu, se v Genezi (in pozneje v Bibliji) imenujejo Nephili.

Sitchin je zapisal, da so se Nephili razvili, ko je Nibiru vstopil v naš zvezdni sistem in so najprej prišli na Zemljo pred približno 450.000 leti, ko so iskali minerale, zlasti zlato, ki so jih našli in izkopavali v Afriki. Sitchin navaja, da so ti "bogovi" delavci kolonialne ekspedicije na Zemljo z planeta Nibiru.

Are we that aliens?

Expert says Humans are Aliens—and we were brought to Earth hundreds of thousands of years ago

What if  Humans are the aliens we’ve been looking for all along? According to experts, humans were most likely crossbred with another species, perhaps from the star system Alpha Centauri –which is one of the closest solar systems to Earth—in the distant past, giving birth to modern humans.

Tell Al-Uhaymir modern-day Iraq, where the ancient Sumerian city of Kish used to be, archaeologists found one of the oldest ancient documents on the planet, the tablet of Kish which is believed to date back to the year 3500 BC.

The Sumerian king list states that Kish was the first city to have kings following the deluge, beginning with Jushur.

Jushur’s successor is called Kullassina-bel, but this is actually a sentence in Akkadian meaning “All of them were lord”. Thus, some scholars have suggested that this may have been intended to signify the absence of a central authority in Kish for a time.

This ancient document is believed to precede the cuneiform writing of the Sumerians, and the Egyptian hieroglyphs for almost one hundred years.

Developing the ability to express thoughts through written language is one of the first ways in which man differed from the animal kingdom.

Five thousand years since, humans have developed electricity, divided the atom, developed computers, and led man to the moon. We have achieved things that other species have still not.

No other species on earth can attribute such unique achievements in such a short period of time. Interestingly, compared to other species of the earth, our ‘evolution’ is relatively short.

It has been a short period of time, most likely a few million years since the first hominid walked on Earth. Precisely this is one of the biggest scientific questions of all times: Why have only our species emerged to this truly advanced technological intelligence?

Evidently,  there is nothing more advanced than humans on planet Earth.

 While there are different ‘intelligent’ species on Earth, none of them makes use of technology like us.

Just imagine for a second, if for some reason, mankind had to return to the jungle, and survive there. Many experts agree that most of them would not survive for a very long period of time.

Many scientists agree that humans, in addition to their intelligence, are not very capable to occupy a wide range of environments. In other words, we are very limited when it comes to our planet.

In addition to our fascinating intelligence, biologists have also noticed contrasts between human physiology and that of other animals on earth. Many scientists agree that compared to other species on earth, humans are rather strange. For example, a baby horse when born is able to walk and function almost independently, but this a human baby cannot do, which makes us quite helpless. In other words, we are born before being neurologically ready for life.

Many researchers agree that there are many vulnerabilities that accompany our intelligence.

Humans on earth eventually became bipeds, which freed up our superior extremities allowing us to manipulate objects, create tools and much more. But for all this, experts believe that our species has paid an expensive price. Lumbar pain a sign that according to many experts could tell us a lot about our species. Curiously, other animals on Earth do NOT have this problem. It’s as if only humans are affected by some of these problems.

So what does all of this mean? According to one expert, it means that we are the aliens we’ve we been looking for all along.

A new theory proposed by Dr. Ellis Silver states that there are several tell-tale signs present in the human race that suggest human beings did not evolve ALONGSIDE other lifeforms on Earth.

The book called ‘Humans are not from Earth: a scientific evaluation of the evidence’ is basically a resume of theories for and mostly against man’s evolution on Earth. In the book, leading environmentalist and ecologist Dr. Ellis Silver goes through an evaluation of thirteen leading hypothesis and seventeen factors which suggest HUMANS ARE NOT FROM EARTH.

Mankind is supposedly the most highly developed species on the planet, yet is surprisingly unsuited and ill-equipped for Earth’s environment: harmed by sunlight, a strong dislike for naturally occurring foods, ridiculously high rates of chronic disease, and more said Dr. Ellis in an interview.

According to Dr. Ellis, humans might suffer from back pain because our species initially evolved on another planet with a lower gravity, adding to the mysteries, Dr. Ellis also indicates that it is strange that newborns have large heads and make it difficult for mothers to give birth, which can result in fatalities for both mother and child.

So where do we come from? According to Dr. Ellis, Neanderthals were most likely crossbred with another species, perhaps from the star system Alpha Centauri –which is one of the closest solar systems to Earth— in the distant past, giving birth to modern humans.

According to Dr. Ellis, there are millions of people around the globe who ‘feel’ that they do not belong on Earth.

Dr. Ellis explains: “This suggests (to me at least) that mankind may have evolved on a different planet, and we may have been brought here as a highly developed species. One reason for this … is that the Earth might be a prison planet since we seem to be a naturally violent species and we’re here until we learn to behave ourselves.”

Dr. Ellis concludes that mankind did not evolve from that particular strain of life, but evolved elsewhere and was transported to Earth (as fully evolved Homo sapiens) between 60,000 and 200,000 years ago.

Furthermore, as noted by Robert Sepher, according to modern DNA sequencing, it is demonstrated that humanity as we know it, isn’t just ONE single ‘race’ that descended from the same ancestor in Africa, but a hybridized species, with a far more enigmatic truth behind it all.

Many questions have been raised in the discussion about Rh negative blood. If mankind did, in fact, evolve from a mutual ancient African ancestor, theories state that everyone’s blood would be compatible, but regrettably, this is not the case. This raises numerous questions that science alone has not been able to fully answer. Where did Rh-negative blood come from? And why is it that a Rh-negative mother carrying Rh positive children tries rejecting her own offspring? Is it possible that this can be explained by a rather controversial theory? A theory which suggests that humanity isn’t in fact one race, but a hybridized species.

The book was written by Robert Sepehr, Species with Amnesia: Our Forbidden History tells us more about the enigmatic blood type Rh-negative. Not only does Species with Amnesia suggest mankind is, in fact, a hybridized species, the author suggests that highly advanced civilizations have been on Earth before us, just to be destroyed by some great global catastrophe, as mysteriously, history tells us.

Sepehr argues that for each race that has died out, another has taken its place, with a selected few holding on to the memories and sacred knowledge of the past race. In our vanity, we think we have discovered some of the great truths of science and technology, but we are in fact only just beginning to rediscover the profound wisdom of past civilizations. In many ways, we are like an awakening Species with Amnesia, yearning to reclaim our forgotten past. –

The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh-negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene.

“There are 612 primate species and subspecies recognized by the International Union for Conversation of Nature (IUCN), and not one has Rh-negative blood”.

awe